Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1821/2025 of BADAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 16 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1821/2025 Badal --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Bharat Singh, learned
UKHC010153612025
2026:UHC:5904
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/1821/2025
Badal
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Bharat Singh, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Present applicant Badal, S/o Babu is praying for bail in reference to Case Crime No. 307 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Section 109(1) of BNS 2023 read with Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and it is a case of no injury and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 29.08.2025, and with regard to the criminal antecedent only one case has been shown which is much prior to the alleged incident. He further submits that the other co-accused, namely, Ritik has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench on 13.10.2025.
5. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State have not disputed that it is a case of no injury and the other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 29.08.2025.
6. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that other co-accused has UKHC010153612025
2026:UHC:5904 already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant ‘Badal’ be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
16.07.2026. Parul