Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/407/2026 of KRISHAN KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 15th July, 2026 WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 407 of 2026 Krishan Kumar ------Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ----Respondents

UKHC010115852026

2026:UHC:5830-DB

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

AND

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY

15th July, 2026

WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 407 of 2026

Krishan Kumar

------Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Others

----Respondents

Presence:-

Mr. G.D. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. B.P.S. Mer, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioner, who is holding the post of Professor (Commerce) in the Department of Higher Education, Government of Uttarakhand, is aggrieved by order of his transfer dated 09.06.2026, by which, he has been transferred from Government P.G. College, Kashipur to Government P.G. College, Halduchaur, Haldwani, District Nainital.

2. The case of the petitioner is that his wife is also a government employee and she is presently posted at Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar. The petitioner is stated to have made a representation to the authorities on 03.07.2026, for re-consideration of the transfer order dated 09.06.2026 and to permit him

UKHC010115852026

2026:UHC:5830-DB to continue at the same place having regard to the spouse policy. He submits that the respondents be directed to consider and decide the said representation.

3. As the petitioner has already joined the transferred place, therefore, we find no impediment in directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 03.07.2026.

4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merit, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Competent Authority to decide the representation made by the petitioner dated 03.07.2026 by speaking order within three weeks from today and communicate his decision to the petitioner.

5. Learned State Counsel shall inform the concerned respondent about the instant order within 48 hours.

6. Pending application, if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)

(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 15.07.2026 KKS/PP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead