Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/362/2026 of MS JRD INFRATECH PVT LTD Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 15 July 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 15th July, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 362 OF 2026 M/s JRD Infratech Pvt. Ltd. ….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.
UKHC010077832026
2026:UHC:5844-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
15th July, 2026
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 362 OF 2026
M/s JRD Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
….Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner
: Sri
Yuvraj
Singh
and
Sri
Akash
Chawla, learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondents
: Sri
J.C.
Pande,
learned
Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT : (PER: SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On 18.05.2026, when the matter was taken-up, we noticed that complete copy of the impugned order was not annexed and, therefore, time was granted to the petitioner to file the same, and the matter was directed to be listed in the next week. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a Supplementary Affidavit and, once again complete order was not brought on record. Consequently, again the matter got adjourned on 05.06.2026.
2. Again, a Supplementary Affidavit has been filed, but this time, the pages have not been arranged in proper sequence and have instead been placed in a jumbled manner. Therefore, we are finding it difficult to examine the dispute and much of the Court’s time is being wasted.
UKHC010077832026
2026:UHC:5844-DB
3. The writ petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to file a proper petition, if so advised.
4. Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed accordingly. _____________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 15th July, 2026 Rathour PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779d9e3aeb10 97d17dbb53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A40CC6179B 8E010331BA695239171F906FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2026.07.16 16:00:59 +05'30'