Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1216/2026 of SHASHIBALA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 14 July 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures UKHC010120782026 2026:UHC:5771 COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1216/2026 Shashibala --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. Mrs. Sheetal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures UKHC010120782026
2026:UHC:5771 COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/1216/2026
Shashibala
--Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Mrs. Sheetal Selwal, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA for the State.
3. Present applicant-Shashibala, W/o Jagat Singh is praying for bail in reference to a First Information Report dated 07.06.2026 bearing FIR No.0157 of 2026, P.S. I.I.T, District Udham Singh Nagar wherein she has been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act.
4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that present applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated; the alleged contraband, charas, which is shown to be recovered, is much below the commercial quantity i.e. 244 grams and there is no substantial compliance of the provision of the NDPS Act. She further argued that the applicant has the criminal antecedents of two cases bearing Case Crime No.039 of 2019 and Case Crime No.1361 of 2019 that too relates to the 60 Excise Act in which she has been already enlarged on bail.
5. On the other hand, learned AGA has not disputed about the quantity of the contraband, which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant, which is, admittedly much below the commercial quantity and has also not disputed about the criminal antecedents.
6. After hearing the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the present applicant is a lady and the alleged contraband, which is shown to be recovered, is only 244 gram of charas and in other two previous cases, applicant has already been enlarged on bail, this court is of the view the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant-Shashibala be released on bail on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 14.07.2026 Arti