Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/1307/2026 of TANUBHAVI ARORA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 13 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1307/2026 Tanubhavi Arora --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Anand Kumar Pandey
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010119662026
2026:UHC:5672 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL/1307/2026
Tanubhavi Arora --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Anand Kumar Pandey and Mr. Jagdish Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Dinesh Chauhan and Mr. Pramod Kumar Tiwari, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following relief:
“i) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 & 3 to give police protection to the petitioners.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners were in a relationship with each other and they have solemnized their marriage on 26.05.2026 in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals. It is submitted that respondent no.4, who is father of petitioner no.1, is opposed to the said marriage and has been extending threats to the petitioners. On account of such opposition, the petitioners apprehend danger to their life and personal liberty at the hands of the respondent no.4. It is further submitted that both the petitioners have attained the age of majority.
UKHC010119662026
2026:UHC:5672
4. Both the petitioners are present before this Court, who have been duly identified by their learned counsel. They state that they have voluntarily solemnized their marriage of their own free will, without any force, coercion or undue influence. The petitioners undertake to apply for registration of their marriage in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand, and the rules framed thereunder.
5. The documents on record reveal that both the petitioners are major. In that view of the matter, and in view of the ruling of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs State of U.P. and another, reported in (2006) 5 SCC 475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection.
6. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners. The S.H.O. is further directed to summon the private respondent, and such other persons, who are inimically placed towards the marriage of the petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law.
7. The writ petition stands ordered accordingly.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
13.07.2026 Arpan
ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20d ddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB9 87446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.07.13 17:04:20 +05'30'