Uttarakhand High Court
CRLR/345/2023 of TARA DATT DUMKA Vs GEETA DUMKA on 13 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR/345/2023 Tara Datt Dumka --Revisionist Versus Geeta Dumka --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Lata Negi, learned counsel for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010080562023
2026:UHC:5727 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CRLR/345/2023 Tara Datt Dumka --Revisionist Versus Geeta Dumka --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
Ms. Lata Negi, learned counsel for the revisionist.
Ms. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present Criminal Revision has been preferred by the revisionist seeking quashing of the order dated 01.03.2023, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-II, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, in Family Suit (Criminal Case) No. 394 of 2016, Smt. Geeta Dumka and Others vs. Taradatt Dumka, whereby the application filed by the respondents under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been allowed and the revisionist has been directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3,000/-, Rs. 4,000/- and Rs. 5,000/- to respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4, respectively.
3. Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that the revisionist and respondent no. 1 have resumed cohabitation and have been residing together as husband and wife since 11.05.2026. In support of the said submission, Misc. Application (IA No. 09 of 2026) has been filed, wherein it has been stated that the parties, namely, the husband and wife, have amicably settled and resolved all their disputes and differences and have decided to reside together peacefully as husband and wife of their own free will and volition, without any pressure, coercion or undue influence from any person whatsoever.
4. The revisionist is present in person before this Court, whereas respondent no. 1 has appeared through video conferencing.
5. Upon interaction, both of them have
UKHC010080562023
2026:UHC:5727 affirmed the contents of the aforesaid application and stated that they are residing together and intend to continue their matrimonial relationship peacefully.
6. In view of the aforesaid development, nothing survives for adjudication in the present revision. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision stands disposed of.
(Alok Mahra, J.) 13-07-2026 SB
SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5 DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.07.14 16:24:19 +05'30'