Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1480/2026 of CHIRAG SHAH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1480/2026 Chirag Shah --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Piyush Sammal, learned counsel

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

UKHC010120142026

2026:UHC:5687 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

C528/1480/2026 Chirag Shah --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Piyush Sammal, learned counsel for the applicant.

Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

2. The present Criminal Misc. Application has been filed seeking quashing of the complaint being Criminal Case No. 2647 of 2025, “Saran Biotech vs. Chirag Shah”, instituted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, along with the cognizance/summoning order dated 20.01.2026, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/IIIrd Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of the aforesaid proceedings, the learned trial Court, vide order dated 28.04.2026, has issued bailable warrants against the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant undertakes to appear before the Court concerned and cooperate with the proceedings. It is, therefore, prayed that till the applicant appears before the Court below, the effect and operation of the order dated 28.04.2026 issuing bailable warrants may be kept in abeyance.

4. Considering the aforesaid submission and without expressing any

UKHC010120142026

2026:UHC:5687 opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the interest of justice would be served by granting limited interim protection to the applicant.

5. Accordingly, as an interim measure, the effect and operation of the order dated 28.04.2026 issuing bailable warrants against the applicant shall remain kept in abeyance till 24.07.2026. However, the applicant is directed to appear before the Court concerned on 24.07.2026 and cooperate with the proceedings. It is made clear that this interim protection is subject to the applicant's appearance before the Court below and shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case.

6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present Criminal Misc. Application stands disposed of.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 13-07-2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c1 2f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED 00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.07.13 18:03:17 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead