Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/404/2026 of ASHOK KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 10 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (S/B) No.404 of 2026 10th July, 2026 Ashok Kumar -----Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ----Respondents

UKHC010115372026

2026:UHC:5619-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

AND

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY

Writ Petition (S/B) No.404 of 2026

10th July, 2026

Ashok Kumar

-----Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Others

----Respondents

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Amar Murti Shukla and Mr. Rohit Kumar Gaur, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Sachin Mohan Singh Mehta, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Learned Standing Counsel has placed on record the instructions received from the Commissioner, according to which, the petitioner is a Group ‘B’ employee, therefore, as per Section 21(1) of the Uttarakhand Annual Transfer for Public Servants Act, 2017, he has been transferred on the recommendation of the Transfer Committee by the Commissioner, who is head of the Department.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already made representation to the department and, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to press his representation.

UKHC010115372026

2026:UHC:5619-DB

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer.

4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)

(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 10.07.2026 SS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead