Uttarakhand High Court
BA4/9/2026 of RUBINA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 10 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Fourth Bail Application No.9 of 2026 Rubina ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Rakesh Negi, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010113842026
2026:UHC:5652
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Fourth Bail Application No.9 of 2026
Rubina
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Rakesh Negi, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No. 16 of 2024, State Vs. Rubina Alvi, arising out of FIR No. 332 of 2023, under Sections 302, 201, 120B, 341 and 506 IPC, Police Station Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. She has sought her release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. This is fourth bail application of the applicant. Her first bail application was rejected on merits on 20.02.2025. Her second bail application was rejected on 20.02.2026. Her third bail application was dismissed as withdrawn on 15.05.2026.
4. Having considered, this Court is of the view that there is no new ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the fourth bail application of the applicant deserves to be rejected.
2
5. The fourth bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
10.07.2026 Jitendra