Uttarakhand High Court

WPMB/567/2026 of ADITYA SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 10 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 10th July, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 567 OF 2026 Aditya Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.

UKHC010116922026

2026:UHC:5632-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

AND

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY

10th July, 2026

WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 567 OF 2026

Aditya Singh

….Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others.

…Respondents

Counsel for the petitioner

: Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Senior

Counsel (through V.C.) assisted by Sri

Abhishek Chilwal, learned counsel.

Counsel for the respondents

: Sri Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned

Additional Advocate General for the

State of Uttarakhand.

JUDGMENT : (PER: SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order passed by the District Magistrate, Nainital dated 26.05.2026, by which penalty has been imposed upon the petitioner under the provisions of the The Uttarakhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation, and Storage) Rules, 2021, as amended by the 4th Amendment, 2024 and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly concedes that against the impugned order, Appeal lies to the Commissioner of the Division.

3. In view of it, we are not inclined to examine the validity of the order, and relegate the petitioner to the remedy provided under Rule 14 of the Uttarakhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation, and Storage) Rules, 2020.

UKHC010116922026

2026:UHC:5632-DB

4. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. _____________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.

___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.

Dt: 10th July, 2026 Rathour PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779d9e3ae b1097d17dbb53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A40CC61 79B8E010331BA695239171F906FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2026.07.13 17:37:27 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead