Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/425/2026 of JAGDISH SINGH RAWAT Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 9 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY WRIT PETTION (S/B) No. 425 of 2026 09th July, 2026 Jagdish Singh Rawat -----Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others
UKHC010118142026
2026:UHC:5580-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
WRIT PETTION (S/B) No. 425 of 2026
09th July, 2026
Jagdish Singh Rawat
-----Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
----Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Prashant Khanna and Himanshu Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. B.P.S. Mer and S.M.S. Mehta, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The parent department of the petitioner is the Revenue Department, but the said department has not been impleaded as party-respondent, nor the petitioner is ready to implead the Department despite objection by the other side.
2. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non- joinder of the necessary party.
3. The petitioner, if so advised, may file fresh writ petition after impleading necessary parties.
4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 09.07.2026 KKS/PP 1