Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1193/2026 of ANMOL KUMAR AGARWAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 9 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1193/2026 Anmol Kumar Agarwal --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Sheetal
UKHC010118082026
2026:UHC:5600
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/1193/2026
Anmol Kumar Agarwal
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ms. Sheetal Selwal, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Present applicant Anmol Kumar Agarwal S/o Late Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agarwal is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 10.06.2026 bearing FIR No. 0184 of 2026 P.S. Ramnagar District Nainital wherein he has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and alleged contraband which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant is 5.987 kg ganja which is non commercial quantity and with regard to the recovery as shown, in fact, there is no substantial compliance of mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act. She argued that present applicant is languishing in jail since 10.06.2026 and have no criminal antecedent.
5. Per contra, Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. on instructions have not disputed about the past criminal antecedent and submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedent and have also not disputed that alleged contraband which is shown to be recovered is non commercial UKHC010118082026
2026:UHC:5600 quantity.
6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the quantity of alleged contraband is non commercial and the applicant has no criminal antecedent, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant “Anmol Kumar Agarwal” be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
09-07-2026 Parul