Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/552/2026 of M/S PODDAR ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED Vs OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSION on 9 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY WRIT PETTION (M/B) No. 552 of 2026 09th July, 2026 M/S Poddar Ispat Private Ltd. -----Petitioner Versus Office of the Deputy Commissioner
UKHC010114912026
2026:UHC:5583-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
WRIT PETTION (M/B) No. 552 of 2026
09th July, 2026
M/S Poddar Ispat Private Ltd.
-----Petitioner
Versus
Office of the Deputy Commissioner through Deputy Commission.
…….Respondent
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Rakesh Prasad Singh, Kanti Ram and Nimral Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Pooja Banga, learned Standing Counsel for the State through V.C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order-in-original dated 23.03.2026 and Show Cause Notices dated 06.12.2025 and 04.02.2025.
2. As regards, challenge to the first notice, Mrs. Pooja Banga, learned Standing Counsel states that the Department in view of issuance of subsequent notice, has not initiated any action on basis of the first notice, therefore, challenge to the said notice is wholly mis- conceived.
UKHC010114912026
2026:UHC:5583-DB
3. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after making submissions at length, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal provided under the statute.
4. Accordingly, as prayed, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal. It shall also be open to the petitioner to seek the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, while filing the appeal.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 09.07.2026 KKS/PP