Uttarakhand High Court
C528/1447/2026 of RASID HUSSAIN ALIAS RASID AND ORS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 8 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1447/2026 With IA 1/2026 (For Compounding Application) Rasid Hussain Alias Rasid And Ors --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C528/1447/2026
With
IA 1/2026 (For Compounding Application)
Rasid Hussain Alias Rasid And Ors
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Mohit Kumar Kashyap, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Mr. Anuj Singh Kunjwal, learned counsel for the respondent.
4. The instant petition has been moved by the applicants Rasid Hussain @ Rasid S/o Riyasat Hussain, Gulam Sabir@ Sabir S/o Riyasat Hussain and Riyasat Hussain S/o Saokat Ali for quashing of proceeding of Criminal Case No. 525 of 2020 arising out of Case Crime No. 0252 of 2018 ‘State vs. Rashid and Others’ pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein, the applicants have been summoned to face the trial for the offences punishable under sections 323, 324 and 504 of IPC.
5. The petition has been filed along with the compounding application with the affidavit of each of the applicants and the respondent/ complainant. The complainant herein is the son- in-law of the applicant no. 3 Riyasat Hussain with whose daughter he married.
6. It is contended in the compounding application that there was some minor issues in between them which they have resolved amicably and there is no dispute and their relations are very cordial. Even the respondent no. 2-the complainant is now living with the daughter of the applicant as husband and wife along with their children and are present in court and are identified by their counsel. This court also interact with each of them and they submit that their relations are now very cordial and requests that the matter to be closed. Complainant also submits that he does not want to pursue with the proceeding due to the amicable settlement and therefore the proceeding be closed.
7. On the other side, learned A.G.A. submits that all the offences are compoundable except the offence punishable under section 324 of IPC but since now the parties have settled their dispute, therefore, there is no useful purpose to proceed with the trial since they have amicably settled their dispute and the initiation of the trial will completely be a futile exercise.
8. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the dispute is in between the parties is only a family dispute which they have now resolved, therefore, the compounding application deserves to be allowed.
9. Accordingly the instant petition preferred under section 528 of BNSS, 2023, as well as the compounding application are allowed and the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 525 of 2020 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar, is also hereby quashed.
10. No order as to costs.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 08.07.2026 PR