Uttarakhand High Court

ABA/342/2023 of JAGDISH SINGH YADAV Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 8 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010063342023 ABA/342/2023 Jagdish Singh Yadav --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Rajni Rangwal,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010063342023 ABA/342/2023

Jagdish Singh Yadav --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Ms. Rajni Rangwal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the applicant.

2. Mr. Manoj Bhatt, Brief Holder for the State.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has died, therefore, cause of action does not survive in the matter.

4. In such view of the matter, the present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(Alok Mahra J.)

08.07.2026 Ujjwal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead