Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/551/2026 of GURUBAKSH SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 6 July 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 06th July, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 551 OF 2026 Gurubaksh Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.
UKHC010112512026
2026:UHC:5380-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
06th July, 2026
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 551 OF 2026
Gurubaksh Singh
….Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner
: Sri S.K. Mandal, learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondents
: Sri
Rajeev
Singh
Bisht,
learned
Deputy Advocate General for the
State of Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT : (PER: SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the Recovery Citation dated 21.04.2026, whereby certain sum is sought to be recovered from the petitioner by way of arrears toward the royalty payable under a mining lease. The said recovery is being made on basis of order dated 18.11.2024 passed by the Director (Mining), Haridwar.
2. The order of the Director (Mining), Haridwar dated 18.11.2024 is subject matter of challenge, at the behest of the petitioner, in WPMB No. 318 of 2026 titled ‘Gurubaksh Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand and others’, and it is stated to be pending.
3. In view of it, we decline to examine the validity of the impugned recovery citation, which is only a consequential action.
UKHC010112512026
2026:UHC:5380-DB
4. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply for stay in the pending writ petition.
5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
_____________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 06th July, 2026 Rathour PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779d9e3aeb1097d1 7dbb53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A40CC6179B8E01 0331BA695239171F906FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2026.07.07 10:33:39 +05'30'