Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/1147/2026 of NAHIM ALIAS LAKKHA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 3 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1147/2026 Nahim Alias Lakkha and Another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Another --Respondents Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

UKHC010106932026

2026:UHC:5324 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPCRL/1147/2026 Nahim Alias Lakkha and Another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Another --Respondents Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Farmaan Ansari, learned counsel holding brief of Ms. Sadaf, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Mr. Mahendra Singh Bisht, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

2. By means of the present Criminal Writ Petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the impugned F.I.R. dated 11.06.2026, registered as Case Crime No. 0215 of 2026, under Sections 109, 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Gangnahar, District Haridwar. The petitioners have also prayed for a direction that they shall not be arrested pursuant to the aforesaid F.I.R.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners have already been arrested in connection with the aforesaid F.I.R. and, therefore, the present Criminal Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous.

4. In view of the aforesaid submission, and since the principal relief sought by the petitioners was protection against arrest, which no longer survives on account of their arrest, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.

5. Accordingly, the present Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 03-07-2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5a a08b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7F F0A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.07.03 16:44:21 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead