Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1080/2026 of DEVENDRA ALIAS LADI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 3 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1080/2026 Devendra Alias Ladi --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. Ms. Rajni Rangwal,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010107952026
2026:UHC:5350 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/1080/2026 Devendra Alias Ladi
--Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Ms. Rajni Rangwal, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA for the State.
3. The instant bail application has been moved by the present applicant Devendra @ Ladi, S/o Subhash for seeking regular bail in reference to first information report dated 20.01.2026 bearing FIR No.0012 of 2026 P.S. Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar wherein three persons namely, Jatin, Rampal and the present applicant with some other unknown persons were implicated for the offence punishable under Section 109 of BNS, 2023.
4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the present applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and even as per the FIR itself the main assailant is one Jatin, who caused injury to the injured. She further argued that one of the co-accused Gurjigar Singh was granted interim protection in WPCRL No.456 of 2026 on the ground that main assailant is the co-accused Jatin, who caused injury to Harshvardhan.
5. On the other side, learned AGA has not disputed that as per the prosecution the main assailant is Jatin however, he further submits that the applicant is indulged in criminal activities since 2015, which is evident from the fact that he has criminal antecedents of four cases though in response to this, learned counsel for the applicant submits that in two UKHC010107952026
2026:UHC:5350 cases the applicant has already been acquitted.
6. After hearing the rival submission of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that as per the prosecution, the main assailant is Jatin and though this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail but fact remains that the applicant have criminal history of four cases and is indulged in criminal activities since 2015, therefore, some stringent condition has to be imposed while granting bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant-Devendra @ Ladi be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:- i. The present applicant shall report to the nearest police station twice a month with the gap of 15 days and the concerned SHO of nearest police station shall record his presence. ii. The applicant shall provide his mobile number to the concerned SHO so that the concerned SHO be vigilant with regard to day today activities of the present applicant. iii. If the applicant is found to be indulged in any criminal activity in future including in respect of the offence under The Forest Act, the prosecution is directed to immediately move an application for cancellation of bail.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 03.07.2026 Arti