Uttarakhand High Court

C447/16/2024 of VINAY SINGH Vs ANITA on 3 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010174452024 C447/16/2024 Vinay Singh --Applicant Versus Anita --Respondent Hon'ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Bharat Tewari, learned counsel for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010174452024 C447/16/2024

Vinay Singh --Applicant Versus Anita --Respondent

Hon'ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

Mr. Bharat Tewari, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Yash Bisht, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent makes a statement at Bar that the matter has become infructuous.

4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, the present C-447 application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Siddhartha Sah, J.) 03-07-2026 Akash

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead