Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1125/2026 of NAWAB ALI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 2 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1125/2026 Nawab Ali --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan,
UKHC010111782026
2026:UHC:5289
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/1125/2026
Nawab Ali
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present applicant Nawab Ali, S/o Israr Ahmad is praying for bail in reference to Range Case No. 40 of 2025-26 dated 06.08.2025, P.S. Forest Department, Haridwar Forest Division, District Haridwar wherein he has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 9, 12, 39, 50 and 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated which is evident from the fact that present applicant is not named in the complaint and those who were named in the complaint have been exonerated. He further submits that all the offences are triable by the Magistrate and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 13.05.2026 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. On the other side, Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State have not disputed that all the offences are triable by the Magistrate and the present applicant has no criminal antecedent.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that all the offences are triable by the Magistrate and the UKHC010111782026
2026:UHC:5289 applicant has no criminal antecedent, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant Nawab Ali be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
02-07-2026 Parul