Uttarakhand High Court
FA/38/2002 of SATYA VARDHAN Vs NARAYAN SINGH on 2 July 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010006592003 2026:UHC:5299 UKHC010006592003 FA/38/2002 Satya Vardhan & others --Appellants Versus Narayan Singh --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UKHC010006592003
2026:UHC:5299
UKHC010006592003 FA/38/2002 Satya Vardhan & others --Appellants Versus Narayan Singh --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Suryakant Maithani, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. The instant first appeal is preferred by the appellant/defendant against the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2002 passed by the learned District Judge, Chamoli, decreeing the original suit no.24 of 1994, filed by the plaintiff/respondent.
4. The instant appeal was already admitted on 08.07.2004 and the lower court record has been received and the paperbook is also prepared.
5. On 29.05.2026, the parties were present before the coordinate Bench. On that day, learned counsel for the parties in the presence of their clients informed to the Court that the defendant/appellant has agreed to pay Rs.10 lacs towards one time settlement, as well as, the amount which is deposited before the Trial Court. It was also undertaken before the coordinate Bench that the compromise will be drafted and will be placed on record. Now in compliance thereof, today the compromise application has been moved along with the affidavit of both the parties with the Xerox copy of the drafts of Rs.6.00 lacs and Rs.4.00 lacs, in total Rs.10 lacs.
6. In paragraph 3 of the compromise as entered between the parties, it is agreed that both the parties shall not litigate against each other in future in respect of the property in dispute since the tenant – Narayan Singh has settled the dispute under one time settlement after taking Rs.10 lacs from the defendant/appellant, as well as the decreetal amount deposited in the Trial Court. It is also agreed that Narayan Singh/tenant has left all his claims and rights over the shop in question and the appellant/landlord will use the property in question as per their own free will.
7. Parties are also present today. Learned counsel for the parties submits that in terms of the compromise entered between the parties instant first appeal be disposed of finally. The bank draft of Rs.6.00 lacs and Rs.4.00 lacs, have been given to the respondent in Court. Compromise application is also taken on record.
8. Since now the parties have settled their dispute amicably in view of the one-time settlement as reflected from paragraph 3 of the compromise, therefore, the instant first appeal is being disposed of in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. The terms and conditions as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the compromise will be treated as part of the decree. The decreetal amount as deposited in the Trial Court will be released in favour of the respondent/plaintiff forthwith.
9. Registry shall prepare the decree accordingly.
10. Trial court record is also remitted back to the concerned Trial Court, after preparation of the decree.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 02.07.2026 Nitesh/