Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/1197/2026 of KASWAR ALIAS TASSAWAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 1 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1197/2026 Kaswar Alias Tassawar --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Bilal

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

UKHC010110952026

2026:UHC:5211 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPCRL/1197/2026 Kaswar Alias Tassawar --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned FIR dated 29.05.2026, registered as Case Crime No. 00218 of 2026, under Section 3/5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, at Police Station Kaliyar Sharif, District Haridwar.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that there is a delay of about five hours in lodging the FIR, for which no explanation has been assigned therein. Learned counsel further submits that, from a bare perusal of the FIR, no specific role has been attributed to the present petitioner. It is also contended that a co-accused, having an identical role, has already been granted relief by this Court.

4. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection if the petitioner is

UKHC010110952026

2026:UHC:5211 permitted to surrender before the court concerned.

5. After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to surrender before the court concerned and seeks liberty to do so.

6. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the said prayer.

7. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the court concerned within a period of one month from today. In the event the petitioner surrenders within the aforesaid period, he shall not be arrested pursuant to the impugned FIR dated 29.05.2026, provided he continues to cooperate with the investigation. After his surrender, it shall be open to the petitioner to seek appropriate relief before the competent court in accordance with law.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 01-07-2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f2182 2fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B 5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.07.01 16:01:46 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead