Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/74/2022 of ARSH WARSI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 29 June 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/74/2022 Arsh Warsi --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Suraiya Naaz, learned counsel
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010006062022
2026:UHC:5133 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL/74/2022 Arsh Warsi --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
Ms. Suraiya Naaz, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. and Mr. Nikhil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed seeking quashing of the F.I.R. dated 22.12.2021, registered as F.I.R. No. 344 of 2021, for the offences punishable under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 41/102 Cr.P.C., at Police Station Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar, with a further prayer not to arrest the petitioner pursuant to the aforesaid F.I.R.
3. On the previous occasion, this Court had directed the learned State Counsel to obtain instructions in the matter.
4. Today, learned Additional Advocate General has placed before the Court the instructions received from the Investigating Agency, which are taken on record. On the basis of the said instructions, she submits that upon completion of the investigation, no role of the petitioner has been found in the alleged incident. Consequently, a final UKHC010006062022
2026:UHC:5133 report has been submitted before the competent Court. She, therefore, submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
5. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned State Counsel and the instructions placed on record by the State, it is evident that the petitioner has not been charge-sheeted and no incriminating material has been found against him during the course of investigation. A final report has already been filed before the competent Court.
6. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Alok Mahra, J.) 29-06-2026 SB
SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f21822fb d40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B52 83D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.06.29 13:46:37 +05'30'