Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1449/2025 of KAMLESH SINGH AND ORS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 29 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010128282025 C528/1449/2025 Kamlesh Singh And Ors --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Manish

SL.

No.

Date

Office

Notes,

reports,

orders or

proceedings

or

directions

and

Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010128282025

C528/1449/2025

Kamlesh Singh And Ors

--Applicant

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand

--Respondent

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, leaned Deputy Advocate General for the State.

3. Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.

4. The instant petition has been preferred by the applicants under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 challenging the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 119 of 2023 (State Vs. Kamlesh Bora and others) arising out of FIR dated 30.12.2022 bearing FIR No. 01/2023, Revenue Area Jaina, Patti Joshikhola, Betalghat, District – Nainital, pending in the court of Civil Judge (JD) / Judicial Magistrate, Ranikhet, District – Almora.

5. Now, compounding application has been moved with the affidavit of applicants and respondent no. 2 wherein it is contended that since the dispute was matrimonial and the parties have now decided to get divorce by way of mutual consent and it is agreed between the parties that towards permanent alimony, husband shall pay Rs. 12,20,000/- and in terms of the compromise, divorce petition has already been filed by way of mutual consent wherein on first motion, Rs. 5,00,000/- has been paid by the husband to wife and remaining Rs. 7,20,000/- will be paid by husband on completion of second motion.

6. Both the parties are present in the court and they are duly identified by their respective counsel through their Adhar card.

7. Both the parties submit that since they have settled their dispute amicably and they do not want to pursue this matter.

8. Learned State Counsel submits that since the dispute appears to be matrimonial in nature and now the parties have decided to settle their dispute to get divorce by way of mutual consent, therefore, there is no useful purpose to proceed with the trial.

9. In such view of the matter, present petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 as well as compounding application no. 02 of 2026 are allowed. Entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 119 of 2023 (State Vs. Kamlesh Bora and others) pending in the court of Civil Judge (JD) / Judicial Magistrate, Ranikhet, District – Almora are hereby quashed.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 29.06.2026 SKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead