Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/908/2026 of RAKESH SINGH BOHRA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 29 June 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/908/2026 Rakesh Singh Bohra --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel
UKHC010089762026
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/908/2026
Rakesh Singh Bohra
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.GA. for the State.
3. Present applicant Rakesh Singh Bohra,S/o Laxmain Singh Bohra praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 26.10.2025, bearing FIR No. 0013 of 2025, P.S. Pancheshwar District Champawat wherein on completion of investigation he has been charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Section 3/4 of the POCSO Act read with Section 65(1) of BNS 2023.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated which is evident from the fact the neither the medical report nor the FSL report supports the case of the prosecution and only on the basis of statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of BNSS 2023 the charge sheet has been filed though there is no sign of sexual assault on the body of the victim and the hymen was found to be intact and in a very casual manner charge sheet has been filed. He further submits that present applicant is languishing in jail since 27.10.2025and further incarceration serves no punitive purpose.
5. On the other side, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State fairly submits that neither the medical report nor the DNA report supports the case of the prosecution and only on the basis of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of BNSS 2023 the charge sheet has been filed.
6. I also gone through with the forensic
UKHC010089762026
report as well as the medical report and there is no sign of sexual assault. Even as per the medical report the hymen was found to be intact except that there are two human bites on the neck of the victim though FSL report does not support the case of prosecution, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant Rakesh Singh Bohra be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
29-06-2026
Parul