Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/528/2026 of M/S BHATT AND THAPLIYAL ENGINEERINGA Vs UTTARAKHAND RURAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AGENCY on 19 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 528 OF 2026 19TH JUNE, 2026 M/s Bhatt and Thapliyal Engineeringa …… Petitioner Versus Uttarakhand Rural
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010108422026
2026:UHC:5093-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 528 OF 2026
19TH JUNE, 2026
M/s Bhatt and Thapliyal Engineeringa …… Petitioner
Versus
Uttarakhand Rural Road Development Agency and others
…… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Yash Bisht, learned counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)
The present writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs : “(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order / bid evaluation report dated 01.06.2026 issued by Bid Evaluation Committee (Annexure No. 2, page No. 20 to 30) inasmuch as order declare the petitioner’s otherwise technically responsive bid as “as not to be technically qualified” and order dated 12.06.2026 (Annexure No. 3, page No. 31 to 33)
UKHC010108422026
2026:UHC:5093-DB passed by Tender Technical Committee whereby representation dated 06.06.2026 (Annexure No. 10, page No. 102 to 103) of the petitioner has been rejected.
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 to declare the technical bid of the petitioner as responsive / technically qualified and to open and process the part II i.e. financial bid of the petitioner;
(c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to award the contract to the petitioner if it is found L1 (lowest bidder);
(d) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to reject the bid of respondent Nos. 4 and 5.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
_______________________
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
_________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 19th JUNE, 2026 Negi
HIMANS HU NEGI Digitally signed by HIMANSHU NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=bb3b60774012c1ef1dae20d13aaf1 16e73351fdaf6878326386908a7f90d5757, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=75BD9D0FB7F4A80990FC51A 722A6BC552D470EB4FD2F88DDF7C18DB2A 1524A4D, cn=HIMANSHU NEGI Date: 2026.06.19 16:59:40 +05'30'