Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/351/2026 of DR TANU MITTAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 18 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 18TH JUNE, 2026 WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 351 OF 2026 Dr. Tanu Mittal …...Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

AND

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY

18TH JUNE, 2026

WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 351 OF 2026

Dr. Tanu Mittal

…...Petitioner.

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & others

….Respondents.

Counsel for the Petitioner

:

Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel.

Counsel for the State

:

Mr.

B.P.S.

Mer,

learned

Standing

Counsel.

JUDGMENT :(per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the transfer order dated 09.06.2026, whereby the petitioner, who is presently posted as Assistant Professor, Sociology, Government P.G. College, New Tehri, has been transferred in the same capacity to Government P.G. College, Talwari, District Chamoli.

2. The case of the petitioner is that she has been transferred on complaint without holding proper inquiry and, therefore, it is in violation of Section 18(4) of the Uttarakhand Annual Transfer for Public Servants Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

3. On the other hand, learned State Counsel submitted that the transfer was made in exercise of power under Section 18(5) of the Act, which reads as under:- “18(5) The competent authority may issue positing/ transfer orders besides the transfer to be made as per clause (1) to (4) aforesaid in separate and different period also and it shall not be necessary to bring such cases before the transfer committee: Provided that on transfers made on administrative grounds the competent authority shall have to take approval from the one rank higher officer.”

4. As the Department has sought to bring the transfer within the purview of sub-section (5) of Section 18 of the Act, therefore, such transfer should have had the approval of officer one rank higher than the competent authority. Consequently, we required the Department to place on record material to indicate that the approval from the higher authority was obtained.

5. Learned State Counsel has obtained further instructions and has place for our perusal the notings on the official file, which indicate that the Department had obtained approval of the concerned Minister for transfer of the petitioner on administrative grounds.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to contend that the noting indicates that the transfer was made on complaint. In other words, he has tried to bring the case under sub-section (4) of Section 18, where enquiry is needed if transfer is made on a complaint. However, the record does not lead to any such conclusion, as in respect of other employees, who had been transferred on complaints, it was so mentioned specifically in the note- sheet. As against the name of the petitioner, it is not stated that she was being transferred on basis of complaint. Thus, we find no illegality in the impugned transfer order.

7. The writ petition lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed.

8. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.

SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dated: 18th June, 2026 NISHANT

NISHANT KUMAR Digitally signed by NISHANT KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=ad3fcb5ca64340f5dd0a4c574afa0fd63133605ca57cdc00 ec2b7462b452b326, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=7E81318F3B1BE7EAAC9370185F7C9C20892BC63A 055CFD1961690560487E670C, cn=NISHANT KUMAR Date: 2026.06.19 12:00:30 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead