Uttarakhand High Court

BA2/266/2025 of GULSHER Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA2 No. 266 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Sadaf, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned

UKHC010165412025

2026:UHC:4990

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

BA2 No. 266 of 2025

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Ms. Sadaf, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. with Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. The present applicant ‘Gulsher’ S/o Mohammad Imran is praying for bail in reference to First Information Report dated 04.082025 bearing FIR No. 350 of 2025 P.S. Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar, wherein, the present applicant along with one Sannwar and two other unknown persons were implicated for the offence punishable under section 109 of BNS, 2023.

4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and on the next date of the incident the injured was discharged from hospital, which is evident from the statement of the Doctor though the injury as per the medical report are grievious in nature. She further argued that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 11.08.2025 and the charge-sheet has been filed and the trial has already been commenced.

5. She also pointed out that the compounding application has already been filed in pending C528 application. She further submits that the present applicant has no criminal antecedent and this fact has not been denied in the counter afffidavit.

6. Learned A.G.A., on instructions, apprise that there was one case against the applicant.

7. Be that as it may, admittedly the applicant is languishing in jail since 11.08.2025 and the charge- sheet has been filed and the trial has already been commenced, therefore, this court is of the view that the applicant deserve for bail.

8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed.

9. Let the applicant ‘Gulsher’ be released on UKHC010165412025

2026:UHC:4990 bail on furnishing his personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

10. It is made clear that after being released on bail if the applicant is found to be indulged in any criminal activity, the prosecution is free to move an application for cancelling the bail.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 17.06.2026 PR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead