Uttarakhand High Court

HABC/18/2026 of RONAK DHIMAN Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Habeas Corpus Petition No.18 of 2026 Ronak Dhiman ...... Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others ..... Respondents Present: Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. . Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Habeas Corpus Petition No.18 of 2026

Ronak Dhiman

...... Petitioner

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Others ..... Respondents

Present: Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. .

Coram:

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The instant habeas corpus petition has been filed on behalf of the corpus Ms. Ronak Dhiman by Rahul Kumar as next friend.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to Rahul Kumar, he and the corpus both are major; they married on 13.04.2026 at Prachin Shiv Mandir, Paniyala Road, Roorkee, District Haridwar, and had also applied for the registration of their marriage, and after applying for registration, they both went to their respective homes, as agreed. But, thereafter, the respondent no.4 has detained the corpus Ms. Ronak Dhiman. Hence, the petition.

4. This Court required the concerned police station to produce the corpus before the Court.

5. Today, S.I. Karuna Raunkly produced the corpus Ms. Ronak Dhiman before the Court. The Court interacted with Ms. Ronak Dhiman. She has stated that she is willingly staying with her parents; she does not want to go with Rahul Kumar. According to her, initially, she had made up her mind to be with Rahul Kumar, but, subsequently, she came to know some more

2 facts about Rahul Kumar. Therefore, she is not willing to join the company of Rahul Kumar. According to the corpus Ms. Ronak Dhiman, her date of birth is 17.03.2006. She is major.

6. The corpus Ms. Ronak Dhiman is free to stay wherever she wants to. The corpus has expressed to stay with her parents. Therefore, no directions need to be passed in the matter.

7. The habeas corpus petition, as such, stands disposed of, accordingly.

(Siddhartha Sah, J.)

(Ravindra Maithani, J.)

17.06.2026

Ravi Bisht

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead