Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/279/2026 of HEM KUMAR Vs UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED on 17 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 17th June, 2026 Writ Petition (S/B) No. 279 of 2026 Hem Kumar ------Petitioner Versus Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. and another
UKHC010077162026
2026:UHC:4926-DB
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY
17th June, 2026
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 279 of 2026
Hem Kumar
------Petitioner
Versus
Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. and another
----Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Sanpreet Singh Azmani, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, learned counsel for the respondents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The grievance raised in the instant writ petition is that the petitioner despite being promoted from the post of Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer by order dated 30.06.2023, has not been paid promotional benefits as certain amount is shown to be outstanding against him under the miscellaneous advance head.
2. The petitioner has already represented to the Department against withholding of the promotional benefits and prays for a direction to respondent no.1 to decide the said representation.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Department has no objection, in case, the said prayer
UKHC010077162026
2026:UHC:4926-DB is granted.
4. Having regard to the facts of the case and the submissions made, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make fresh representation along with copy of the instant order before the respondent no.1. In the event, any such representation is made, the same shall be decided by respondent no.1 by a speaking order within six weeks thereafter.
5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 17.06.2026 Kaushal/PP