Uttarakhand High Court
C528/1175/2026 of VIKAS YADAV ALIAS VICKY Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 16 June 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1175/2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Siddharth Bankoti, learned counsel for the applicant through Legal Aid. 2. Mr. Tumul
2026:UHC:4899
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C528/1175/2026
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Siddharth Bankoti, learned counsel for the applicant through Legal Aid.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Mr. Tumual Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State submits that remand was sought for recovery of weapon and vehicle used in the commission of crime and the remand was granted and thereafter on the pointing out of the present applicant recovery was made, therefore, the instant petition is now rendered infructuous.
4. In view of the statement as given by the learned State Counsel the instant C528 petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
16.06.2026 Parul
2026:UHC:4899