Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1338/2026 of HUNNY VERMA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 16 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1338/2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chandel, learned Counsel with Mr. Nikhil Kushwaha, learned counsel for

2026:UHC:4877

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

C528/1338/2026

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chandel, learned Counsel with Mr. Nikhil Kushwaha, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. The instant petition has been preferred by the applicant Hunny Verma under Section 528 of BNSS 2023 challenging the proceeding of complaint case no. 3471 of 2022, Irshad vs. Hunny Verma which is a proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate Ist, Haridwar.

4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that in fact cheques in question were misused by the respondent/complainant which, in fact, he has given as a security for supply of building materials and not against the payment towards the construction work. He submits that the present applicant in response to the demand notice gave all details in his response despite this complainant/respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.

5. Admittedly, on the complaint, the trial court already took cognizance and summoned the applicant, therefore, all the pleas whether cheques in question were security cheque or not are the subject matter of the trial. On such plea, the proceedings cannot be quashed under Section 528 of BNSS 2023. The applicant is therefore free to take all defence pleas before the trial court.

6. In such view of the matter, I do not find any substance in the instant petition and the same is dismissed being devoid of merit.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)

16.06.2026 Parul

2026:UHC:4877

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead