Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/321/2026 of VANSH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 15 June 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/321/2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Nancy, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. S.K. Shandilya, learned counsel for the
2026:UHC:4829
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/321/2026
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ms. Nancy, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. S.K. Shandilya, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present applicant Vansh, S/o Radhelal is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 08.10.2025, bearing FIR No. 0338 of 2025, P.S. Bhagwanpur District Haridwar which was lodged against unknown person for the offence punishable under Section 137(2) of BNS 2023 in which after completion of investigation charge sheet has been filed against the present applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m), 87 of BNS 2023 read with Section 5(l)/6 of the POCSO Act.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel or the applicant that applicant is aged about 22 years and was in love with the daughter of the informant and they known to each other since last one year which she admits in her statement. She further submits that charge sheet has already been filed for the offences punishable under Section 137(2), 64(2)(m), 87 of BNS 2023 read with Section 5(l)/6 of the POCSO Act and therefore, at this stage there is no need of further interrogation of the applicant who is languishing in jail since 28.10.2025. She further submits that the applicant has no previous history.
5. On the other side, Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal learned Brief Holder for the State submits that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS 2023 support the case of the prosecution, though, she also admits that the applicant offered for marriage which she has accepted. He has no disputed that the applicant has no previous criminal history.
6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into
2026:UHC:4829 consideration that charge sheet has already been filed and also after gone through with the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 and 183 of BNSS 2023 this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant ‘Vansh’ be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
15.06.2026 Parul