Uttarakhand High Court

BA1/345/2025 of ROHIT NEGI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 12 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA 1st No.345 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mukul Singh Dangi, learned legal aid counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Vijay Khanduri,

SL.

No

Date

Office Notes, reports,

orders or proceedings

or directions and

Registrar’s order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

BA 1st No.345 of 2025

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Mukul Singh Dangi, learned legal aid counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant bail application has now become infructuous as the applicant has already been convicted by the Trial Court.

4. In such view of the matter, the instant bail application is dismissed as infructuous.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 12.06.2026 Nitesh/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead