Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/732/2025 of HARJEET KASHYAP Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 12 June 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 732 of 2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1 No. 732 of 2025
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA with Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present applicant Harjeet Kashyap, S/o Late Sushil Kashyap praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 24.08.2024, bearing FIR No. 0426 of 2024 at P.S. Gangnahar, District Haridwar, lodged against unknown persons for the offence punishable under Sections 309(6), 324(2) and 351(3) of BNS 2023.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated which is evident from the fact that the FIR has been lodged against unknown person; however without any credible evidence the applicant has been implicated. He further submits that the applicant is languishing in jail since 27.08.2024 and he has no criminal antecedents and the charge sheet has already been filed and the trial has been commenced, but there is no possibility that the trial would be soon, therefore, taking into consideration that he is languishing in jail since 27.08.2024 he may be enlarged on bail.
5. On the other side, Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State have not disputed this fact the applicant is languishing in jail since 27.08.2024 and the trial has already been commenced and furthermore the applicant has no criminal antecedent.
6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the applicant is languishing in jail since 27.08.2024 and he has no criminal antecedent and the trial has already been commenced but there is no possibility that the trial would be expedite soon, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant “Harjeet Kashyap” be released on bail on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
12.06.2026 Nahid