Uttarakhand High Court
C528/184/2026 of JAVED AHAMAD Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 4 June 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Compounding Application No. 01 of 2026 In C 528 No. 184 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mehboob Rahi, learned counsel for the
SL. No.
Date
Office Notes, reports, orders
or proceedings or directions
and Registrar’s order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
Compounding Application No. 01 of 2026
In
C 528 No. 184 of 2026
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Mehboob Rahi, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA for the State.
3. Mr. Kaushal Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 - complainant.
4. Learned AGA submits that offence punishable under Section 307 IPC is not compoundable and injuries sustained by the injured are grievous in nature and danger to the life and there is recovery of weapon used in the commission of crime on the pointing out of the accused - applicant.
5. Injured Faheem, applicant Javed Ahmed and complainant – Mohd. Faiz, are present in the Court and they are duly identified by their respective counsel.
6. This Court interacted with injured Faheem and after interaction, this Court finds that the injured – Faheem making an attempt to mislead the Court.
7. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have settled their dispute amicably and now, they have cordial relations, therefore, in the interest of justice, present compounding application be allowed.
8. Taking into consideration that injured Faheem is misleading to the Court and furthermore, offence is not compoundable and injuries are grievous in nature, this Court is of the view that the compounding application cannot be allowed and deserve to be dismissed. Accordingly, C528 application as well as the compounding application both are dismissed.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 04.06.2026 SKS