Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/1019/2026 of SHAMSU Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 3 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 1019 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel

SL.

No

Date

Office Notes, reports,

orders or proceedings

or directions and

Registrar’s order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

WPCRL No. 1019 of 2026

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. By the instant petition the petitioner is praying for the following reliefs: i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR lodged by the respondent no. 3 on 28.05.2026 registered as FIR No. 109 of 2026 for the offences punishable under section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Kaliyar Shareef, District Haridwar against the petitioner (contained as Annexure no. 1 to the writ petition), qua the petitioner, from page no. 14 to 20. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 1 and 2 not to arrest the petitioner and not take any coercive measure against the petitioner in pursuance to the impugned FIR dated 28.05.2026 registered as FIR No. 109 of 2026 for the offences punishable under section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Kaliyar Shareef, District Haridwar against the petitioner (contained as Annexure no. 1 to the writ petition), qua the petitioner, from page no. 14 to 20.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to surrender before the court concerned, however, he may be given some reasonable time to surrender.

5. Learned State counsel have not raised any objection.

6. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the petitioner to surrender before the court concerned on or before 28.05.2026, failing which the I.O. concerned is directed to take him in custody forthwith. Till then no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner provided he cooperates with the investigation.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 03.06.2026 PR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead