Uttarakhand High Court
SA/135/2014 of SMT. KOMAL RANI Vs SMT. KAMLA DEVI on 30 May 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SA No.135 of 2014 With SA No.131 of 2014 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the appellant has submitted that in view of the
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes, reports,
orders or proceedings
or directions and
Registrar’s order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
SA No.135 of 2014
With
SA No.131 of 2014
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the
appellant has submitted that in view of the provisions of Order 43 Rule 1(u) CPC, the second appeal would not be maintainable rather Appeal from
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
would be maintainable. He seeks permission to withdraw both the second appeals with liberty to file fresh Appeal from Order. Both the second appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
30.05.2026
Ravi