Uttarakhand High Court

BA3/19/2026 of RAJESHWARI DEVI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 29 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 34 BA3 No.19 of 2026 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Siddharth Tomar, Advocate for the applicant, through video conferencing. Ms. Manisha Rana

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

s9SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 34

BA3 No.19 of 2026 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Mr. Siddharth Tomar, Advocate for the applicant, through video conferencing. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the bail application. The permission is accorded. The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ravindra Maithani J.)

29.05.2026 RV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead