Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/957/2026 of RAJESH KISHORE JOSHI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 27 May 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 957 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Menka Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Tumul Nainwal,
2026:UHC:4211
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No. 957 of 2026
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ms. Menka Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. on instructions informed to this Court that on completion of investigation pursuant to the impugned FIR, now closure report has been filed and nothing has been found against the petitioner since the dispute appears to be civil in nature.
3. In such view of the matter, since final report has been submitted, the instant writ petition has now rendered infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
27.05.2026
Shiv/