Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/20/2026 of TAHIRA KHATOON ALIAS CHHOTI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 22 May 2026
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Third Bail Application No. 20 of 2026 Tahira Khatoon @ Chhoti ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Siddharth Tomar, Advocate for the applicant, through video conferencing. Mr. J.S. Virk, D.A.G. for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Third Bail Application No. 20 of 2026
Tahira Khatoon @ Chhoti
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Siddharth Tomar, Advocate for the applicant, through video conferencing.
Mr. J.S. Virk, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.169 of 2024, under Sections 8, 21, 27, 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. This is the third bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.1797 of 2024, was rejected on 09.01.2025. The second bail application, being BA2 No.136 of 2025, was rejected on 13.03.2026.
4. Having considered, this Court does not see any new ground, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.
5. The bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
22.05.2026 Ravi Bisht