Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/1170/2026 of NAVNEET KUMAR PANDEY Vs ALMORA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD on 21 May 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 54 WPSS No.1170 of 2026 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Devika Tiwari, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1-
WPSS No.1170 of 2026 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Devika Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent no.1. The petitioner has challenged the chargesheet given to him and finally the termination order dated 30.03.2026. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that against termination order, departmental appeal may be preferred, which can be heard by the Board of Directors for which limitation period is 90 days. She submits that it is under Regulation of the Service Regulation of the Employees for the Bank Employees. On it, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to prefer an appeal before the Board of Directors. The permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as above.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
21.05.2026 RV