Uttarakhand High Court
BA4/6/2026 of RAMPAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 14 May 2026
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Fourth Bail Application No. 06 of 2026 Rampal ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Fourth Bail Application No. 06 of 2026
Rampal
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.
Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.761 of 2022, under Section 370 IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. This is the fourth bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.1198 of 2023, was dismissed in non- prosecution on 13.05.2024. The second bail application, being BA2 No.152 of 2024, was rejected on 01.07.2024. The third bail application, being BA3 No.77 of 2024, was also rejected on 03.12.2024.
4. Having considered, this Court does not see any new ground, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.
5. The bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
14.05.2026 Ravi Bisht