Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/1097/2026 of VAHIDAN Vs MUSTKIM on 6 May 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 06.05.2026 WPMS No.1097 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate for the petitioner. The present petition was filed
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
0 6 .0 5 .2 0 2 6
WPMS No.1097 of 2026
Hon ’ble Siddh ar t h a Sah , J.
Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate for the petitioner.
The present petition was filed seeking a direction to the Trial Court to decide the application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the CPC within time bound period.
Today, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before the Court’s order dated 21.04.2026 passed by the trial court, wherein, order has been passed that the construction work being carried out by the defendants would be ensured to be stopped and referring to the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a submission that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.
The copy of the order dated 21.04.2026 has been placed on record.
In view of the aforesaid, the present petition has become infructuous and deserves to be dismissed as such.
[
( Siddh ar t h a Sah , J.) 06.05.2026 Ravi