Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/1237/2026 of RAJENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 05.05.2026 WPMS No.1237 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Harshvardhan Bhatt, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Abhijay Negi, learned

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

05.05.2026

WPMS No.1237 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

Mr. Harshvardhan Bhatt, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Abhijay Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. K. S. Mehta, learned Addl. C.S.C. along with Mr. C.S. Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. Mr. Dev Ashish Rana, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

4. By means of the present petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Vikasnagar, to expedite Election Petition No. 10 of 2025 (Annexure No. 1) within a time- bound period, preferably within six months.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the orders passed by two Division Benches of this Court in the cases of Deeksha Negi vs. State of Uttarakhand and in the case of Neeru Chauhan vs. State of Uttarakhand (Annexure Nos. 3 and 4 respectively), as well as to the order dated 22.04.2026 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPMS No. 1023 of 2026, Ashish Khatri vs. Prashant Kharola and others (Annexure No. 5), and submits that both the Division Benches as well as the Coordinate Bench of this Court have directed expeditious disposal of election petitions.

6. It is further submitted that the Election Tribunal is required to adhere to the provisions of

Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act and, in fact, the Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 22.04.2026, directed expeditious disposal of the election petition positively within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of the said order.

7. On the strength of the aforesaid orders and with reference to Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that a direction be issued for expeditious disposal of the election petition. On a query being made, learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have no objection to the said prayer.

8. Since the prayer sought appears to be innocuous, and considering the orders passed by the Division Benches as well as the Coordinate Bench of this Court, coupled with the fact that the other side has no objection, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Vikasnagar, to decide Election Petition No. 10 of 2025 positively within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

9. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

(Siddhartha Sah, J.)

05.05.2026 BS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead