Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/240/2026 of RAKESH KANDARI Vs PRINCIPAL SECRETARY on 27 April 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB 240/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate, for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:UHC:3153-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB 240/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ranjan Ghildiyal, Standing Counsel, for the State. Mr. Ravi Bisht, Advocate, i/b Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the respondent no. 2.
Petitioners are serving as Assistant Environment Engineer in Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board. According to them, their claim for promotion is not being considered for want of promotional avenues. Relief sought in the writ petition are as follows:
“I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent department to grant promotion to the petitioners by reinstating two posts for environmental engineer as per communication dated 29.03.2010.
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent department to grant promotion to the petitioners effective from the date of promotions of their juniors in accordance with the Government Order dated 11.06.2003 (Annexure No. 14 Page No. 103).”
Creation or abolition of posts is the sole discretion of the employer, therefore this Court does not find any good ground to interfere in the matter.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have made representation to the competent authority for revival of the post, who may be directed to take decision on the same.
2026:UHC:3153-DB
Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by directing the competent authority to take decision on petitioners’ representation, as per law, within six months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
27.04.2026 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e 61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB 588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.04.27 17:26:25 +05'30'