Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/11/2026 of RAHUL KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 23 April 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 37 BA3 No.11 of 2026 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. In this
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 37
BA3 No.11 of 2026 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. In this third bail application, short term bail application, IA No.01 of 2026, has been filed on the ground that the applicant is suffering with some infections. Learned State Counsel submits that, in fact, the applicant is normal. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the third bail application. The permission is accorded. The third bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
23.04.2026 RV