Uttarakhand High Court
CLR/41/2026 of RAGUVEER SINGH NEGI Vs GANGA SINGH on 17 April 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 17.04.2026 CLR No.41 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. B. D. Pandey and Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
17.04.2026
CLR No.41 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. B. D. Pandey and Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for the revisionist.
2. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. After arguments at some length, learned counsel for the respondent placed the correct legal position before the Court by citing the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Jagdish Narayan Tandon & Others v. Onkar Nath Tandon & Others.
4. Learned counsel for the revisionist seeks permission to withdraw the revision with liberty to file a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The said prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondent.
5. In view of the above, learned counsel for the revisionist is permitted to withdraw the revision with liberty to file a writ petition as aforesaid.
6. The revision is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with such liberty.
7. On the request of learned counsel for the revisionist, the Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order after retaining a photocopy of the same on record.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
17.04.2026 BS