Uttarakhand High Court
SA/32/2026 of SATISH KUMAR Vs MOHIT AGARWAL on 16 April 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SA No.32 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate for the appellant. The Registry has pointed out the defect that as per
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
SA No.32 of 2026
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate for the appellant.
The Registry has pointed out the defect that as per Order 43 Rule 1 of CPC, the appeal from order should have been filed instead of second appeal.
After going through the relevant provisions of CPC, Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present second appeal with liberty to file appeal from order.
The present second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above.
[
(Siddhartha Sah, J.) 16.04.2026
Ravi