Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/529/2026 of MAHENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 9 April 2026
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 529 of 2026 Mahendra Singh ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Mukuk Dangi, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 529 of 2026
Mahendra Singh
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Mukuk Dangi, Advocate for the applicant.
Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, Advocate for the informant, through video conferencing.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.612 of 2021, under Sections 302, 34 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Ramnagar, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the main accused, who has been assigned the role of killing, has already been granted bail; the applicant has not been assigned as such any role.
4. These facts are not disputed by learned State Counsel.
2
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
09.04.2026 Ravi Bisht